Jane Lambert
In Disputes over Ownership of Inventions 6 Aug 2015 NIPC South East I wrote:
"According to the Intellectual Property Office at least 30 disputes are referred to its tribunals every year over who should own or be entitled to apply for a British or foreign patent or be named as an inventor (see the table on page 50 of the IPO's Facts and figures for 2013 and 2014 calendar years)."
As I said in the next sentence, disputes over ownership of patents or patent applications are known as "entitlement disputes." Of the 41 inter partes hearings, and reasoned decisions made without a hearing in 2014 mentioned in that table, 31 were entitlement disputes. The situation had not changed much by 2018 which is the last year for which I have been able to find comparable statistics. According to the table on page 60 of Facts and Figures 2018, entitlement disputes accounted for 24 of the 38 inter partes hearings,
reasoned decisions made without a hearing and reviews
of opinions in 2017 and 21 of the 32 in 2018.
Entitlement disputes are often heartbreaking because they arise from a breakdown of hope and trust and sometimes friendship. The right to a patent or patent application is contested fiercely even when the patent is clearly invalid or of little commercial value. There are three types of relationships from which entitlement disputes tend to arise:
- The first is between friends or acquaintances where one of them has a bright idea and the others pitch in to help him or her develop it.
- The second is where the inventor hires a product design consultant, engineer or some other contractor to help with the product's design or development.
- The third is where the inventor or the original collaborators accept investment from an angel, venture capitalist or some other third party.
In the first situation, the friends or acquaintances fall out when they meet the first hurdle. That can occur in a variety of ways. One of them may want to apply for a patent or make a prototype and the others do not because they will have to dip into funds that they had earmarked for other purposes. The second situation may arise because the inventor and third party fail to draw up a proper consultancy agreement or rely on the standard terms of business of the third party which do not reflect the parties' intentions. The third situation can arise where the investor has paid for everything and the inventor has contributed nothing other than his or her initials idea but still insists on the application proceeding in his or her name alone.
Each of those situations can be avoided if the parties take independent legal advice and negotiate a written agreement that reflects the parties' intentions before any time or money is committed. By independent, I mean a barrister, solicitor or patent attorney who is unconnected with the patent attorney who prosecutes the patent application. I say that because in every entitlement dispute in which I have been instructed the attorney has been instructed by one of the parties. It is next to impossible to act for a client but also safeguard the often conflicting interests of the other parties.
A properly negotiated and drafted agreement will anticipate the possibility of the parties falling out over minor as well as major issues and provide machinery for resolving them such as expert determination in the case of minor issues and mediation or some other form of alternative dispute resolution in the case of major issues. Taking independent legal advice may be daunting at a time of rising interest rates and flattening demand but it is chickenfeed in comparison to the costs of the sort of entitlement dispute that I describe in my 2015 article. And in relation to that article, the only thing that has changed since 2015 has been the costs of litigation which have increased along with everything else,
So if you are thinking of collaborating on the development of an invention or investing in such a collaboration have a word with me or some other specialist lawyer or attorney first. If you are unfortunate enough to be caught up in an entitlement dispute, I (or someone like me) may be able to advise you on how to resolve it without going before a hearing officer. If a tribunal hearing cannot be avoided, you will need some skilled and experienced specialist representation before it. Once again, there are members of the Intellectual Property Bar Association (of which I am one), the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys and specialist solicitors who can help you,
Anyone wishing to discuss this article may call me on 020 7404 5252 or send me a message through my
contact page,
No comments:
Post a Comment